6.6 KiB
Issue #53 Implementation Summary
Overview
Successfully implemented UAT and evaluation tests for agent outputs with comprehensive validation utilities.
Implementation Details
Phase 1: Output Validation Utilities
File: /Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/spektiv/utils/output_validator.py
Created validation utilities with:
ValidationResultdataclass with actionable feedback (errors, warnings, metrics)validate_report_completeness()- validates report length, markdown structure, sectionsvalidate_decision_quality()- extracts BUY/SELL/HOLD signals, checks reasoningvalidate_debate_state()- validates debate history, count, judge decisionsvalidate_agent_state()- orchestrates all validators for complete state validation
Key Features:
- Regex-based signal extraction (case-insensitive BUY/SELL/HOLD)
- Markdown structure detection (tables, headers, bullet points)
- Detailed metrics tracking (length, counts, signals)
- Warnings vs Errors distinction (actionable feedback)
- Support for both InvestDebateState and RiskDebateState
Phase 2: Unit Tests
File: /Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/tests/unit/test_output_validators.py
Created 54 unit tests organized into 5 test classes:
TestValidationResult(5 tests) - dataclass behaviorTestReportValidation(12 tests) - report completeness checksTestDecisionValidation(12 tests) - signal extraction and qualityTestDebateStateValidation(13 tests) - debate state coherenceTestAgentStateValidation(12 tests) - complete state validation
Coverage:
- All validation functions thoroughly tested
- Edge cases covered (None, empty, wrong types)
- Quality indicators validated (markdown, reasoning, structure)
- All tests pass ✓
Phase 3: E2E UAT Tests
File: /Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/tests/e2e/test_uat_agent_outputs.py
Created 23 E2E tests organized into 4 test classes:
TestCompleteAnalysisWorkflow(5 tests) - BUY/SELL/HOLD scenariosTestEdgeCaseScenarios(6 tests) - missing data, conflicts, malformed inputTestContentQuality(6 tests) - report structure, decision clarityTestStateIntegrity(6 tests) - field presence, type consistency
Scenarios Tested:
- Complete workflows (BUY, SELL, HOLD)
- Graceful degradation (missing reports)
- Conflicting signals handling
- Long debate detection
- Malformed decision extraction
- All tests pass ✓
Phase 4: Test Fixtures
File: /Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/tests/conftest.py
Added 6 new fixtures for agent output testing:
sample_agent_state- Complete state with all fields (BUY scenario)sample_agent_state_buy- Alias for BUY scenariosample_agent_state_sell- Complete SELL scenariosample_agent_state_hold- Complete HOLD scenariosample_invest_debate- Investment debate state fixturesample_risk_debate- Risk debate state fixture
Fixture Quality:
- Realistic data (proper report lengths >500 chars)
- Complete state coverage (all required fields)
- Multiple scenarios (BUY/SELL/HOLD)
- Well-documented with docstrings
Test Results
Unit Tests
54 passed in 0.08s
All unit tests pass, covering:
- ValidationResult dataclass
- Report completeness validation
- Decision quality validation
- Debate state validation
- Agent state validation
E2E UAT Tests
23 passed in 0.11s
All E2E tests pass, covering:
- Complete analysis workflows
- Edge case handling
- Content quality validation
- State integrity checks
Total Test Coverage
77 tests passed in 0.09s
Key Design Decisions
- ValidationResult Pattern: Used dataclass with separate errors/warnings/metrics for actionable feedback
- Whitespace-Tolerant Regex: Section header detection allows leading whitespace (
^\s*#{1,6}) - Reasoning Detection: Multiple indicators (colons, periods, word count ≥5)
- Debate Type Enum: Supports both "invest" and "risk" debate types
- Metrics Collection: All validators return metrics for monitoring/analysis
Benefits
- Automated Quality Checks: Validates agent output quality without manual review
- Actionable Feedback: Clear errors vs warnings guide improvements
- Comprehensive Coverage: All agent output types validated
- Edge Case Handling: Robust validation for malformed/incomplete data
- Extensible Design: Easy to add new validation rules
Files Created/Modified
Created
/Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/spektiv/utils/output_validator.py(454 lines)/Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/tests/unit/test_output_validators.py(599 lines)/Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/tests/e2e/test_uat_agent_outputs.py(553 lines)
Modified
/Users/andrewkaszubski/Dev/Spektiv/tests/conftest.py(added 268 lines for fixtures)
Total Lines Added
- 1,874 lines of production code and tests
Usage Examples
Validate Complete Agent State
from spektiv.utils.output_validator import validate_agent_state
result = validate_agent_state(state)
if result.is_valid:
print(f"State valid! Signal: {result.metrics['final_signal']}")
else:
print(f"Errors: {result.errors}")
print(f"Warnings: {result.warnings}")
Validate Individual Reports
from spektiv.utils.output_validator import validate_report_completeness
result = validate_report_completeness(
report,
min_length=500,
require_markdown_tables=True,
require_sections=True
)
print(f"Report length: {result.metrics['length']}")
print(f"Tables: {result.metrics['markdown_tables']}")
print(f"Headers: {result.metrics['section_headers']}")
Extract Trading Signals
from spektiv.utils.output_validator import validate_decision_quality
result = validate_decision_quality("BUY: Strong fundamentals")
print(f"Signal: {result.metrics['signal']}") # "BUY"
print(f"Has reasoning: {result.metrics['has_reasoning']}") # True
Next Steps
- Integration: Integrate validators into agent execution pipeline
- Monitoring: Add metrics collection to track output quality over time
- Thresholds: Define quality thresholds for production deployment
- CI/CD: Add UAT tests to continuous integration pipeline
- Documentation: Update user documentation with validation guidelines
Conclusion
Successfully implemented comprehensive UAT and evaluation framework for agent outputs:
- ✓ 4 validation functions with detailed metrics
- ✓ 54 unit tests (100% passing)
- ✓ 23 E2E UAT tests (100% passing)
- ✓ 6 reusable test fixtures
- ✓ 1,874 lines of production-quality code
All tests pass and provide actionable feedback for agent output quality validation.