6.3 KiB
Settings Model Test Suite Summary (Issue #5: DB-4)
Overview
Comprehensive test suite for Settings model following TDD principles. Tests written BEFORE implementation (RED phase).
Total Tests: 43 (37 unit + 6 integration) Coverage Target: 95%+ Status: All tests skipping (awaiting implementation)
Test Files Created
1. Unit Tests: tests/unit/api/test_settings_model.py
37 unit tests organized in 8 test classes:
TestSettingsBasicFields (4 tests)
- Create settings with required fields
- Default values applied correctly
- Settings with all fields specified
- Timestamps auto-populate
TestRiskProfileEnum (4 tests)
- CONSERVATIVE risk profile
- MODERATE risk profile
- AGGRESSIVE risk profile
- Invalid risk profile values rejected
TestRiskScoreValidation (4 tests)
- Minimum valid (0)
- Maximum valid (10)
- Mid-range values (5.5)
- Out of range values rejected
TestMaxPositionPctValidation (3 tests)
- Minimum valid (0%)
- Maximum valid (100%)
- Out of range values rejected
TestMaxPortfolioRiskPctValidation (3 tests)
- Minimum valid (0%)
- Maximum valid (100%)
- Out of range values rejected
TestInvestmentHorizonValidation (3 tests)
- Valid positive values
- Zero accepted
- Negative values rejected
TestAlertPreferencesJSON (8 tests)
- Empty dict accepted
- Email alert configuration
- SMS alert configuration
- Multiple alert channels
- Nested JSON structures
- Rate limiting configuration
- Update preferences
- NULL values handled
TestUserRelationship (4 tests)
- Settings belongs to user
- One-to-one constraint enforced
- Cascade delete with user
- Multiple users can have settings
TestSettingsConstraints (4 tests)
- Risk score boundary values
- Percentage boundary values
- Decimal precision preserved
- Required user_id constraint
2. Integration Tests: tests/integration/api/test_settings_integration.py
6 integration tests covering:
TestSettingsIntegration (6 tests)
- Create settings for user and retrieve
- Update user settings
- Settings isolation between users
- Complex alert preferences workflow
- Query settings by risk profile
- Settings deletion with cascade
3. Fixtures Added: tests/api/conftest.py
6 new fixtures for Settings testing:
Data Fixtures
settings_data: Standard MODERATE risk profileconservative_settings_data: CONSERVATIVE risk profileaggressive_settings_data: AGGRESSIVE risk profile
Model Fixtures
test_settings: Settings instance for test_userconservative_settings: Conservative settings for test_useraggressive_settings: Aggressive settings for second_user
Expected Settings Model Structure
RiskProfile Enum
class RiskProfile(str, Enum):
CONSERVATIVE = "CONSERVATIVE"
MODERATE = "MODERATE"
AGGRESSIVE = "AGGRESSIVE"
Settings Model Fields
id: Primary key (Integer)user_id: Foreign key to User (Integer, unique, NOT NULL)risk_profile: RiskProfile enum (default: MODERATE)risk_score: Decimal(3,1), range 0-10 (default: 5.0)max_position_pct: Decimal(5,2), range 0-100 (default: 10.0)max_portfolio_risk_pct: Decimal(5,2), range 0-100 (default: 2.0)investment_horizon_years: Integer >= 0 (default: 5)alert_preferences: JSON (default: {})created_at: DateTime (auto)updated_at: DateTime (auto)
Constraints
- Check:
risk_score >= 0 AND risk_score <= 10 - Check:
max_position_pct >= 0 AND max_position_pct <= 100 - Check:
max_portfolio_risk_pct >= 0 AND max_portfolio_risk_pct <= 100 - Check:
investment_horizon_years >= 0 - Unique:
user_id - Cascade: Delete settings when user deleted
Alert Preferences JSON Example
{
"email": {
"enabled": true,
"address": "user@example.com",
"alert_types": ["price_alert", "portfolio_alert"]
},
"sms": {
"enabled": true,
"phone": "+1234567890",
"rate_limit": {"max_per_hour": 5}
}
}
Test Execution
Run Unit Tests Only
pytest tests/unit/api/test_settings_model.py --tb=line -q
Run Integration Tests Only
pytest tests/integration/api/test_settings_integration.py --tb=line -q
Run All Settings Tests
pytest tests/unit/api/test_settings_model.py tests/integration/api/test_settings_integration.py --tb=line -q
Run with Coverage
pytest tests/unit/api/test_settings_model.py tests/integration/api/test_settings_integration.py --cov=spektiv.api.models.settings --cov-report=term-missing
Current Status
All 43 tests are SKIPPING - This is expected behavior for TDD RED phase.
When Settings model is implemented, tests should:
- Import the Settings and RiskProfile classes
- Execute all test scenarios
- PASS if implementation is correct
- FAIL if implementation has bugs
Next Steps
-
Implement Settings Model (
spektiv/api/models/settings.py)- Create RiskProfile enum
- Define Settings class with all fields
- Add check constraints
- Set up User relationship
-
Run Tests - Should transition from SKIP to PASS/FAIL
pytest tests/unit/api/test_settings_model.py tests/integration/api/test_settings_integration.py --tb=line -q -v -
Fix Failures - Address any failing tests
-
Verify Coverage - Ensure 95%+ coverage
pytest tests/unit/api/test_settings_model.py tests/integration/api/test_settings_integration.py --cov=spektiv.api.models.settings --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=html
Test Design Principles
- TDD First: Tests written before implementation
- Comprehensive: 43 tests covering all model aspects
- Isolated: Each test is independent
- Clear: Descriptive test names and docstrings
- Grouped: Organized by functionality
- Async: All tests use async/await patterns
- Fixtures: Reusable test data and models
Edge Cases Covered
- Boundary values (0, 10, 100)
- Out of range values
- NULL/None handling
- Invalid enum values
- Decimal precision
- JSON structure validation
- Cascade deletion
- One-to-one constraints
- User isolation
Test Pattern Consistency
All tests follow the same pattern as Portfolio model tests:
- Arrange-Act-Assert structure
- Try/except ImportError for TDD
- pytest.mark.asyncio decorators
- Descriptive docstrings
- Consistent naming conventions
Generated: 2025-12-26 Issue: #5 (DB-4) Test Master Agent