76 lines
2.5 KiB
Python
76 lines
2.5 KiB
Python
from tradingagents.agents.utils.agent_utils import update_risk_debate_state
|
|
from tradingagents.agents.utils.llm_utils import parse_llm_response
|
|
|
|
|
|
def create_safe_debator(llm):
|
|
def safe_node(state) -> dict:
|
|
risk_debate_state = state["risk_debate_state"]
|
|
history = risk_debate_state.get("history", "")
|
|
|
|
current_risky_response = risk_debate_state.get("current_risky_response", "")
|
|
current_neutral_response = risk_debate_state.get("current_neutral_response", "")
|
|
|
|
market_research_report = state["market_report"]
|
|
sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"]
|
|
news_report = state["news_report"]
|
|
fundamentals_report = state["fundamentals_report"]
|
|
|
|
trader_decision = state["trader_investment_plan"]
|
|
|
|
prompt = f"""You are the Risk Audit Reviewer. Your job is to find the fastest ways this trade fails (5-14 days) and tighten the setup if possible.
|
|
|
|
## CORE RULES (CRITICAL)
|
|
- Evaluate this ticker IN ISOLATION (no portfolio sizing, no portfolio impact).
|
|
- Use ONLY the provided reports and trader plan as evidence.
|
|
- You are not required to be conservative; you are required to be precise about invalidation and risk.
|
|
|
|
## OUTPUT STRUCTURE (MANDATORY)
|
|
|
|
### Stance
|
|
Choose BUY or SELL (no HOLD). If the setup looks poor, still pick the less-bad side and be specific about invalidation and the fastest failure modes.
|
|
|
|
### Failure Modes (Top 3)
|
|
- [1] [Risk] → [what would we see in price/news/data?]
|
|
- [2] ...
|
|
- [3] ...
|
|
|
|
### Invalidation & Risk Controls
|
|
- Invalidation trigger: [specific]
|
|
- Stop improvement (if needed): [price/logic]
|
|
- Timing risk: [what catalyst could flip this]
|
|
|
|
### Response to Aggressive/Neutral (Brief)
|
|
- [1-2 bullets total]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**TRADER'S PLAN:**
|
|
{trader_decision}
|
|
|
|
**YOUR TASK:** Identify the risks others are missing and tighten the trade with clear invalidation.
|
|
|
|
**MARKET DATA:**
|
|
- Technical: {market_research_report}
|
|
- Sentiment: {sentiment_report}
|
|
- News: {news_report}
|
|
- Fundamentals: {fundamentals_report}
|
|
|
|
**DEBATE HISTORY:**
|
|
{history}
|
|
|
|
**AGGRESSIVE ARGUMENT:**
|
|
{current_risky_response}
|
|
|
|
**NEUTRAL ARGUMENT:**
|
|
{current_neutral_response}
|
|
|
|
**If no other arguments yet:** Identify trade invalidation and the key risks using only the provided data."""
|
|
|
|
response = llm.invoke(prompt)
|
|
response_text = parse_llm_response(response.content)
|
|
argument = f"Safe Analyst: {response_text}"
|
|
|
|
return {"risk_debate_state": update_risk_debate_state(risk_debate_state, argument, "Safe")}
|
|
|
|
return safe_node
|