TradingAgents/tradingagents/agents/managers/risk_manager.py

82 lines
3.6 KiB
Python

import time
import json
from tradingagents.agents.utils.korean_prompt import (
KOREAN_INVESTOR_GUIDE,
KOREAN_DEBATE_GUIDE,
KOREAN_FINAL_DECISION_GUIDE,
)
def create_risk_manager(llm, memory):
def risk_manager_node(state) -> dict:
company_name = state["company_of_interest"]
history = state["risk_debate_state"]["history"]
risk_debate_state = state["risk_debate_state"]
market_research_report = state["market_report"]
news_report = state["news_report"]
fundamentals_report = state["fundamentals_report"]
sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"]
trader_plan = state["investment_plan"]
curr_situation = f"{market_research_report}\n\n{sentiment_report}\n\n{news_report}\n\n{fundamentals_report}"
past_memories = memory.get_memories(curr_situation, n_matches=2)
past_memory_str = ""
for i, rec in enumerate(past_memories, 1):
past_memory_str += rec["recommendation"] + "\n\n"
prompt = f"""As the Risk Management Judge and Debate Facilitator, your goal is to evaluate the debate between three risk analysts—Aggressive, Neutral, and Conservative—and determine whether to ENTER a NEW long position in this stock.
Context: There is currently NO existing position. The trader is evaluating a fresh entry. The only valid decisions are:
- **BUY**: Enter a new long position now — the risk/reward is favorable for a new entry.
- **PASS**: Do not enter — the risks are too high or the timing is wrong; skip this trade.
SELL is NOT a valid option since there is no existing position.
Guidelines for Decision-Making:
1. **Summarize Key Arguments**: Extract the strongest points from each analyst about whether this is a good entry point, focusing on entry risk and reward.
2. **Provide Rationale**: Support your recommendation with direct quotes and counterarguments from the debate.
3. **Refine the Trader's Plan**: Start with the trader's original plan, **{trader_plan}**, and adjust it based on the analysts' insights about entry risk.
4. **Learn from Past Mistakes**: Use lessons from **{past_memory_str}** to address prior misjudgments and improve the decision you are making now to make sure you don't make a wrong BUY/PASS call.
Deliverables:
- A clear and actionable recommendation: Buy or Pass.
- Detailed reasoning anchored in the debate and past reflections.
---
**Analysts Debate History:**
{history}
---
Focus on actionable insights and continuous improvement. Build on past lessons, critically evaluate all perspectives, and ensure each decision advances better outcomes.
{KOREAN_INVESTOR_GUIDE}
{KOREAN_DEBATE_GUIDE}
{KOREAN_FINAL_DECISION_GUIDE}
"""
response = llm.invoke(prompt)
new_risk_debate_state = {
"judge_decision": response.content,
"history": risk_debate_state["history"],
"aggressive_history": risk_debate_state["aggressive_history"],
"conservative_history": risk_debate_state["conservative_history"],
"neutral_history": risk_debate_state["neutral_history"],
"latest_speaker": "Judge",
"current_aggressive_response": risk_debate_state["current_aggressive_response"],
"current_conservative_response": risk_debate_state["current_conservative_response"],
"current_neutral_response": risk_debate_state["current_neutral_response"],
"count": risk_debate_state["count"],
}
return {
"risk_debate_state": new_risk_debate_state,
"final_trade_decision": response.content,
}
return risk_manager_node