TradingAgents/tradingagents/agents/managers/research_manager.py

70 lines
3.2 KiB
Python

import time
import json
from tradingagents.agents.utils.korean_prompt import (
KOREAN_INVESTOR_GUIDE,
KOREAN_DEBATE_GUIDE,
)
def create_research_manager(llm, memory):
def research_manager_node(state) -> dict:
history = state["investment_debate_state"].get("history", "")
market_research_report = state["market_report"]
sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"]
news_report = state["news_report"]
fundamentals_report = state["fundamentals_report"]
investment_debate_state = state["investment_debate_state"]
curr_situation = f"{market_research_report}\n\n{sentiment_report}\n\n{news_report}\n\n{fundamentals_report}"
past_memories = memory.get_memories(curr_situation, n_matches=2)
past_memory_str = ""
for i, rec in enumerate(past_memories, 1):
past_memory_str += rec["recommendation"] + "\n\n"
prompt = f"""As the portfolio manager and debate facilitator, your role is to critically evaluate this round of debate and make a definitive decision on whether to ENTER a NEW long position in this stock.
Context: There is currently NO existing position in this stock. The only question is: "Should we BUY to open a new position now, or PASS and not enter?"
Your decision options are:
- **BUY**: Enter a new long position now — the bull case is compelling and the entry timing is right.
- **PASS**: Do not enter — the risks or poor timing outweigh the opportunity; wait for a better setup.
Summarize the key points from both sides concisely, focusing on the most compelling evidence or reasoning about entry timing and risk/reward. Avoid defaulting to PASS simply because both sides have valid points; commit to a stance grounded in the debate's strongest arguments.
Additionally, develop a detailed entry plan for the trader if recommending BUY. This should include:
Your Recommendation: A decisive BUY or PASS stance supported by the most convincing arguments.
Rationale: An explanation of why these arguments lead to your conclusion about entering now.
Strategic Actions: If BUY — concrete entry parameters (price levels, position sizing approach, stop-loss levels). If PASS — what conditions would need to change before reconsidering entry.
Take into account your past mistakes on similar situations. Use these insights to refine your decision-making and ensure you are learning and improving. Present your analysis conversationally, as if speaking naturally, without special formatting.
Here are your past reflections on mistakes:
\"{past_memory_str}\"
Here is the debate:
Debate History:
{history}
{KOREAN_INVESTOR_GUIDE}
{KOREAN_DEBATE_GUIDE}
"""
response = llm.invoke(prompt)
new_investment_debate_state = {
"judge_decision": response.content,
"history": investment_debate_state.get("history", ""),
"bear_history": investment_debate_state.get("bear_history", ""),
"bull_history": investment_debate_state.get("bull_history", ""),
"current_response": response.content,
"count": investment_debate_state["count"],
}
return {
"investment_debate_state": new_investment_debate_state,
"investment_plan": response.content,
}
return research_manager_node