71 lines
3.3 KiB
Python
71 lines
3.3 KiB
Python
from langchain_core.messages import AIMessage
|
|
import time
|
|
import json
|
|
|
|
|
|
def create_bear_researcher(llm, memory):
|
|
def bear_node(state) -> dict:
|
|
investment_debate_state = state["investment_debate_state"]
|
|
history = investment_debate_state.get("history", "")
|
|
bear_history = investment_debate_state.get("bear_history", "")
|
|
|
|
current_response = investment_debate_state.get("current_response", "")
|
|
market_research_report = state["market_report"]
|
|
sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"]
|
|
news_report = state["news_report"]
|
|
fundamentals_report = state["fundamentals_report"]
|
|
|
|
curr_situation = f"{market_research_report}\n\n{sentiment_report}\n\n{news_report}\n\n{fundamentals_report}"
|
|
past_memories = memory.get_memories(curr_situation, n_matches=2)
|
|
|
|
past_memory_str = ""
|
|
for i, rec in enumerate(past_memories, 1):
|
|
past_memory_str += rec["recommendation"] + "\n\n"
|
|
|
|
prompt = f"""ROLE: Hostile Bearish Litigator.
|
|
OBJECTIVE: Win the debate by destroying the Bull case.
|
|
STYLE: Aggressive, data-driven, direct. NO "I agree with my colleague." NO politeness.
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS:
|
|
1. Expose Risks: Highlight failure points, debt loads, and macro headwinds.
|
|
2. Attack Bull Points: If Bull cites "growth," cite "saturation" and "valuation bubble."
|
|
3. Evidence First: Every claim must cite specific data points.
|
|
|
|
WARNING: You will be Fact-Checked. If you lie about numbers, the Trade will be REJECTED.
|
|
|
|
Key points to focus on:
|
|
|
|
- Risks and Challenges: Highlight factors like market saturation, financial instability, or macroeconomic threats that could hinder the stock's performance.
|
|
- Competitive Weaknesses: Emphasize vulnerabilities such as weaker market positioning, declining innovation, or threats from competitors.
|
|
- Negative Indicators: Use evidence from financial data, market trends, or recent adverse news to support your position.
|
|
- Bull Counterpoints: Critically analyze the bull argument with specific data and sound reasoning, exposing weaknesses or over-optimistic assumptions.
|
|
- Engagement: Present your argument in a direct, adversarial style, refuting the bull analyst's points with data.
|
|
|
|
Resources available:
|
|
|
|
Market research report: {market_research_report}
|
|
Social media sentiment report: {sentiment_report}
|
|
Latest world affairs news: {news_report}
|
|
Company fundamentals report: {fundamentals_report}
|
|
Conversation history of the debate: {history}
|
|
Last bull argument: {current_response}
|
|
Reflections from similar situations and lessons learned: {past_memory_str}
|
|
Use this information to deliver a compelling bear argument, refute the bull's claims, and engage in a dynamic debate that demonstrates the risks and weaknesses of investing in the stock. You must also address reflections and learn from lessons and mistakes you made in the past.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
response = llm.invoke(prompt)
|
|
|
|
argument = f"Bear Analyst: {response.content}"
|
|
|
|
new_investment_debate_state = {
|
|
"history": history + "\n" + argument,
|
|
"bear_history": bear_history + "\n" + argument,
|
|
"bull_history": investment_debate_state.get("bull_history", ""),
|
|
"current_response": argument,
|
|
"count": investment_debate_state["count"] + 1,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {"investment_debate_state": new_investment_debate_state}
|
|
|
|
return bear_node
|