from tradingagents.agents.utils.agent_utils import format_memory_context from tradingagents.agents.utils.llm_utils import parse_llm_response def create_risk_manager(llm, memory): def risk_manager_node(state) -> dict: company_name = state["company_of_interest"] history = state["risk_debate_state"]["history"] risk_debate_state = state["risk_debate_state"] market_research_report = state["market_report"] news_report = state["news_report"] fundamentals_report = state["fundamentals_report"] sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"] trader_plan = state.get("trader_investment_plan") or state.get("investment_plan", "") past_memory_str = format_memory_context(memory, state) prompt = ( f"""You are the Final Trade Decider for {company_name}. Make the final SHORT-TERM call (5-14 days) based on the risk debate and the provided data. ## CORE RULES (CRITICAL) - Evaluate this ticker IN ISOLATION (no portfolio sizing, no portfolio impact, no correlation analysis). - Base your decision on the provided reports and debate arguments only. - Output a clean, actionable trade setup: entry, stop, target, and invalidation. ## DECISION FRAMEWORK (Simple) Pick one: - **BUY** if the upside path is clearer than the downside and the trade has a definable stop/target with reasonable risk/reward. - **SELL** if downside path is clearer than the upside and the trade has a definable stop/target. If evidence is contradictory, still choose BUY or SELL and set conviction to Low. ## OUTPUT STRUCTURE (MANDATORY) ### Final Decision **DECISION: BUY** or **SELL** (choose exactly one) **Conviction: High / Medium / Low** **Time Horizon: [X] days** ### Execution - Entry: [price/condition] - Stop: [price] ([%] risk) - Target: [price] ([%] reward) - Risk/Reward: [ratio] - Invalidation: [what would prove you wrong] - Catalyst / Timing: [what should move it in next 1-2 weeks] ### Rationale - [3 bullets max: strongest data-backed reasons] ### Key Risks - [2 bullets max: main ways it fails] """ + ( f""" ## PAST LESSONS - CRITICAL Review past mistakes to avoid repeating trade-setup errors: {past_memory_str} **Self-Check:** Have similar setups failed before? What was the key mistake (timing, catalyst read, or stop placement)? """ if past_memory_str else "" ) + f""" --- **RISK DEBATE TO JUDGE:** {history} **MARKET DATA:** Technical: {market_research_report} Sentiment: {sentiment_report} News: {news_report} Fundamentals: {fundamentals_report} """ ) response = llm.invoke(prompt) response_text = parse_llm_response(response.content) new_risk_debate_state = { "judge_decision": response_text, "history": risk_debate_state["history"], "risky_history": risk_debate_state["risky_history"], "safe_history": risk_debate_state["safe_history"], "neutral_history": risk_debate_state["neutral_history"], "latest_speaker": "Judge", "current_risky_response": risk_debate_state["current_risky_response"], "current_safe_response": risk_debate_state["current_safe_response"], "current_neutral_response": risk_debate_state["current_neutral_response"], "count": risk_debate_state["count"], } return { "risk_debate_state": new_risk_debate_state, "final_trade_decision": response_text, } return risk_manager_node