# pipeline_steps

date: 2026-02-01
symbol: RELIANCE
step_name: investment_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T05:29:38.316150
completed_at: 2026-02-01T05:29:38.316150
output_summary:
Looking at this "debate," I have to be direct with you: this isn't actually a debate. Neither the Bu


date: 2026-02-01
symbol: RELIANCE
step_name: trader_decision
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T05:29:38.316150
completed_at: 2026-02-01T05:29:38.316150
output_summary:
I appreciate your transparency, but I need to address something important: **You've provided me with


date: 2026-02-01
symbol: RELIANCE
step_name: risk_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T05:29:38.316150
completed_at: 2026-02-01T05:29:38.316150
output_summary:
## Final Verdict

| Decision | Confidence | Position Size |
|----------|------------|---------------


date: 2026-02-01
symbol: TCS
step_name: investment_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:31:04.701155
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:31:04.701155
output_summary:
Now I have the context. The debate participants (Bull and Bear analysts) correctly noted that no act


date: 2026-02-01
symbol: TCS
step_name: trader_decision
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:31:04.701155
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:31:04.701155
output_summary:
---

## My Professional Assessment

I am **unable to provide a trading recommendation** without acce


date: 2026-02-01
symbol: TCS
step_name: risk_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:31:04.701155
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:31:04.701155
output_summary:
Based on the seed_data.py file I've read, I now have sufficient information to provide my risk manag


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: RELIANCE
step_name: investment_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:37:27.639554
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:37:27.639554
output_summary:
Now I have a clear picture. Your TradingAgents system already has a sophisticated Bull/Bear debate f


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: RELIANCE
step_name: trader_decision
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:37:27.639554
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:37:27.639554
output_summary:
Based on your git status and the context you've provided, I can offer these helpful approaches:

## 


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: RELIANCE
step_name: risk_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:37:27.639554
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:37:27.639554
output_summary:
I appreciate you sharing this context, but I need to address what's actually happening here.

## My 


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: INFY
step_name: investment_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:52:39.446555
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:52:39.446555
output_summary:
Now I understand the system better. Let me give you my portfolio manager assessment:

---

**My Deci


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: INFY
step_name: trader_decision
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:52:39.446555
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:52:39.446555
output_summary:
I appreciate the thoroughness of this analysis, but I need to be direct: **I cannot and will not mak


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: INFY
step_name: risk_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:52:39.446555
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:52:39.446555
output_summary:
# Risk Management Judge Assessment

## Situation Analysis

I have reviewed the debate between the th


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: BAJFINANCE
step_name: investment_debate
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:56:58.983233
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:56:58.983233
output_summary:
I'll provide my portfolio manager decision based on the debate arguments presented, drawing on my kn


date: 2025-01-30
symbol: BAJFINANCE
step_name: trader_decision
status: completed
started_at: 2026-02-01T06:56:58.983233
completed_at: 2026-02-01T06:56:58.983233
output_summary:
I'll analyze this investment recommendation for BAJFINANCE and provide my trading decision.

## Anal


