import time import json def create_risk_manager(llm, memory): def risk_manager_node(state) -> dict: company_name = state["company_of_interest"] history = state["risk_debate_state"]["history"] risk_debate_state = state["risk_debate_state"] market_research_report = state["market_report"] news_report = state["news_report"] fundamentals_report = state["news_report"] sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"] trader_plan = state["investment_plan"] curr_situation = f"{market_research_report}\n\n{sentiment_report}\n\n{news_report}\n\n{fundamentals_report}" past_memories = memory.get_memories(curr_situation, n_matches=2) past_memory_str = "" for i, rec in enumerate(past_memories, 1): past_memory_str += rec["recommendation"] + "\n\n" prompt = f"""As the Risk Management Judge and Debate Facilitator for SHORT-TERM trading (1-2 week horizon), your goal is to evaluate the debate between three risk analysts—Risky, Neutral, and Safe/Conservative—and determine the best position for the trader over the next 1-2 weeks. Your decision must result in a clear position recommendation: LONG, SHORT, or HOLD. Choose HOLD only if strongly justified by specific arguments, not as a fallback when all sides seem valid. Strive for clarity and decisiveness. Guidelines for Decision-Making (1-2 week timeframe): 1. **Summarize Key Arguments**: Extract the strongest points from each analyst, focusing on relevance to SHORT-TERM price movement. 2. **Provide Rationale**: Support your recommendation with direct quotes and counterarguments from the debate, emphasizing near-term factors. 3. **Refine the Trader's Plan**: Start with the trader's original plan, **{trader_plan}**, and adjust it based on the analysts' insights for a 1-2 week holding period. 4. **Learn from Past Mistakes**: Use lessons from **{past_memory_str}** to address prior misjudgments and improve the decision you are making now to make sure you don't make a wrong LONG/SHORT/HOLD call that loses money in the short term. Deliverables: - A clear and actionable position recommendation: LONG, SHORT, or HOLD for the next 1-2 weeks. - Detailed reasoning anchored in the debate and past reflections, focusing on short-term factors. --- **Analysts Debate History:** {history} --- Focus on actionable SHORT-TERM insights and continuous improvement. Build on past lessons, critically evaluate all perspectives, and ensure each decision optimizes for the 1-2 week timeframe.""" response = llm.invoke(prompt) new_risk_debate_state = { "judge_decision": response.content, "history": risk_debate_state["history"], "risky_history": risk_debate_state["risky_history"], "safe_history": risk_debate_state["safe_history"], "neutral_history": risk_debate_state["neutral_history"], "latest_speaker": "Judge", "current_risky_response": risk_debate_state["current_risky_response"], "current_safe_response": risk_debate_state["current_safe_response"], "current_neutral_response": risk_debate_state["current_neutral_response"], "count": risk_debate_state["count"], } return { "risk_debate_state": new_risk_debate_state, "final_trade_decision": response.content, } return risk_manager_node