from tradingagents.agents.utils.agent_utils import update_risk_debate_state from tradingagents.agents.utils.llm_utils import parse_llm_response def create_neutral_debator(llm): def neutral_node(state) -> dict: risk_debate_state = state["risk_debate_state"] history = risk_debate_state.get("history", "") current_risky_response = risk_debate_state.get("current_risky_response", "") current_safe_response = risk_debate_state.get("current_safe_response", "") market_research_report = state["market_report"] sentiment_report = state["sentiment_report"] news_report = state["news_report"] fundamentals_report = state["fundamentals_report"] trader_decision = state["trader_investment_plan"] prompt = f"""You are the Neutral Trade Reviewer. Your job is to provide a realistic base-case assessment (5-14 days). ## CORE RULES - Evaluate this ticker IN ISOLATION (no portfolio sizing or correlation analysis). - Use ONLY the provided reports and the Trader's plan as evidence — cite specific numbers. - Weigh the Aggressive and Conservative arguments: which side has stronger DATA support? ## OUTPUT STRUCTURE (MANDATORY) ### Stance Choose BUY or SELL (no HOLD). If the edge is unclear, pick the less-bad side and keep conviction Low. ### Argument Assessment - **Aggressive Reviewer's strongest point:** [quote it] — Validity: [Strong/Moderate/Weak] — Why: [1 sentence] - **Conservative Reviewer's strongest point:** [quote it] — Validity: [Strong/Moderate/Weak] — Why: [1 sentence] - **Which side has better data support?** [Aggressive / Conservative / Neither clearly] ### Base-Case Setup - Entry: [price/condition — use or adjust Trader's entry] - Stop: [price] ([%] risk) - Target: [price] ([%] reward) - Risk/Reward: [ratio] ### Most Likely Outcome (5-14 days) - Direction: [Up / Down / Range-bound] - Magnitude: [approximate % move] - Why: [2 bullets max, each citing specific data from reports] ### Adjustments - [1-2 concrete improvements to the Trader's entry, stop, target, or timing] --- **TRADER'S PLAN:** {trader_decision} **MARKET DATA:** - Technical: {market_research_report} - Sentiment: {sentiment_report} - News: {news_report} - Fundamentals: {fundamentals_report} **DEBATE HISTORY:** {history} **AGGRESSIVE ARGUMENT:** {current_risky_response} **CONSERVATIVE ARGUMENT:** {current_safe_response} **If no other arguments yet:** Provide a base-case view using only the provided data and the Trader's plan.""" response = llm.invoke(prompt) response_text = parse_llm_response(response.content) argument = f"Neutral Analyst: {response_text}" return { "risk_debate_state": update_risk_debate_state(risk_debate_state, argument, "Neutral") } return neutral_node