diff --git a/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/aggresive_debator.py b/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/aggresive_debator.py
index 7e2b4937..8363b0ad 100644
--- a/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/aggresive_debator.py
+++ b/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/aggresive_debator.py
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Your task is to create a compelling case for the trader's decision by questionin
 Market Research Report: {market_research_report}
 Social Media Sentiment Report: {sentiment_report}
 Latest World Affairs Report: {news_report}
-Company Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
+Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
 Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here are the last arguments from the conservative analyst: {current_safe_response} Here are the last arguments from the neutral analyst: {current_neutral_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints, do not halluncinate and just present your point.
 
 Engage actively by addressing any specific concerns raised, refuting the weaknesses in their logic, and asserting the benefits of risk-taking to outpace market norms. Maintain a focus on debating and persuading, not just presenting data. Challenge each counterpoint to underscore why a high-risk approach is optimal. Output conversationally as if you are speaking without any special formatting."""
diff --git a/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/conservative_debator.py b/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/conservative_debator.py
index c56e16ad..961a786e 100644
--- a/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/conservative_debator.py
+++ b/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/conservative_debator.py
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Your task is to actively counter the arguments of the Risky and Neutral Analysts
 Market Research Report: {market_research_report}
 Social Media Sentiment Report: {sentiment_report}
 Latest World Affairs Report: {news_report}
-Company Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
+Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
 Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here is the last response from the risky analyst: {current_risky_response} Here is the last response from the neutral analyst: {current_neutral_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints, do not halluncinate and just present your point.
 
 Engage by questioning their optimism and emphasizing the potential downsides they may have overlooked. Address each of their counterpoints to showcase why a conservative stance is ultimately the safest path for the firm's assets. Focus on debating and critiquing their arguments to demonstrate the strength of a low-risk strategy over their approaches. Output conversationally as if you are speaking without any special formatting."""
diff --git a/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/neutral_debator.py b/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/neutral_debator.py
index a6d2ef5c..6a5ff5c5 100644
--- a/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/neutral_debator.py
+++ b/tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/neutral_debator.py
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Your task is to challenge both the Risky and Safe Analysts, pointing out where e
 Market Research Report: {market_research_report}
 Social Media Sentiment Report: {sentiment_report}
 Latest World Affairs Report: {news_report}
-Company Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
+Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
 Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here is the last response from the risky analyst: {current_risky_response} Here is the last response from the safe analyst: {current_safe_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints, do not halluncinate and just present your point.
 
 Engage actively by analyzing both sides critically, addressing weaknesses in the risky and conservative arguments to advocate for a more balanced approach. Challenge each of their points to illustrate why a moderate risk strategy might offer the best of both worlds, providing growth potential while safeguarding against extreme volatility. Focus on debating rather than simply presenting data, aiming to show that a balanced view can lead to the most reliable outcomes. Output conversationally as if you are speaking without any special formatting."""